Corker, who is already under federal investigation for alleged insider trading involving a real-estate firm, spent the weekend making a series of less-than-convincing statements justifying his switch. He first told IBT that he hadn’t read the bill. Then he wrote an angry letter to Senate leaders questioning how this provision got into the bill. As #CorkerKickback trended on Twitter, the senator also claimed that the language was part of the House version of the legislation. Experts rejected that. “This new language can’t be found in either the House-passed or Senate-passed bills,” Matt Gardner of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy told IBT. Read more
Quoted Staff Member
Matthew Gardner
Senior Fellow
Related Reading
December 17, 2025
State Rundown 12/17: Tax Policy ‘Naughty or Nice’ List Has Late Entrants
December 3, 2025
State Rundown 12/3: Property Tax Cuts and Deficits
Mentioned Locations
Washington
