Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy

State Corporate Taxes

report  

Testimony before the Maryland Business Tax Commission

July 9, 2009 • By ITEP Staff

Consequently, combined reporting represents the most comprehensive option available to states seeking to halt the erosion of their corporate tax bases and to curtail corporate tax avoidance. It ensures that form – specifically, the form in which corporations choose to organize themselves, which may be manipulated to reduce their tax liabilities – does not triumph […]

report  

ITEP Testimony on Corporate Tax Reform before the New York State Senate Select Committee on Budget and Tax Reform

May 21, 2009 • By ITEP Staff

The stated purpose of this hearing is to evaluate the impact of New York’s business taxes on equity and economic growth. These are laudable concerns: the most basic questions to ask about any corporate break are whether they are allocated fairly, and whether there’s any reason to think they will help create jobs in New […]

report  

ITEP Testimony on Combined Reporting, Before the Massachusetts General Court Joint Committee on Revenue

March 5, 2008 • By ITEP Staff

Over the past few months, a strong consensus appears to have developed here in Massachusetts, a consensus that the Commonwealth should put a stop to tax avoidance by large and profitable businesses and adopt a new approach to its corporate excise tax – a method of taxation commonly referred to as combined reporting. I want […]

report  

ITEP Testimony on Governor’s Plan: Corporate Tax Reform

October 31, 2007 • By ITEP Staff

My testimony examines a problem facing not just Maryland, but a number of different states – the erosion of the corporate income tax and the related emergence of profitable “zero-tax corporations.” I also will discuss the single best strategy available to lawmakers seeking to respond to the problem of corporate tax avoidance – mandatory combined […]

report  

Combined Reporting – How Does Your State Stack Up?

April 15, 2007 • By ITEP Staff

Over the past few years, a number of states, seeking to address longstanding flaws in their corporate income taxes and significant declines in the revenue they yield, have instituted a major reform: combined reporting. Combined reporting requires multi-state corporations to report the income earned by both the parent corporation and all of its subsidiaries and […]

brief  

Broad-Based Gross Receipts Taxes: A Worthwhile Alternative?

March 1, 2007 • By ITEP Staff

States currently face a number of fiscal challenges, ranging from unresolved structural deficit, to underlying flaws in their existing tax systems, to the demands posed by ambitious initiatives such as improved access to health care. In response, some policymakers are casting about for new alternatives for generating revenue that do not seem to require visible or difficult changes in law. One such alternative that has gained in popularity in the past few years is a broad-based gross receipts tax.

report  

ITEP Testimony on Combined Corporate Income Tax Reporing in Maryland

February 28, 2007 • By ITEP Staff

My testimony today examines a problem facing not just Maryland, but a number of different states – the erosion of the corporate income tax and the related emergence of profitable “zero-tax corporations.” I also will discuss the single best strategy available to lawmakers seeking to respond to the problem of corporate tax avoidance – mandatory […]

report  

Why Large Corporations Can Do Business in Your State Tax-Free – The “Substantial Nexus” Test

December 15, 2006 • By ITEP Staff

The holiday season is in full swing — and chances are you’re buying gifts on the Internet or over the phone, from people you will never meet and companies that will never set foot in your state. These companies are clearly benefitting from services provided by your state government. They could not conduct their business […]

report  

ITEP Testimony on SB 403 and SB 748 – Combined Reporting & Corporate Minimum Tax

March 9, 2005 • By ITEP Staff

My testimony today focuses on a trend in the Maryland corporate income tax that is becoming increasingly visible—the emergence of profitable “zero-tax corporations”—and on two effective and complementary solutions to this problem, mandatory combined reporting and a gross-receipts-based minimum corporate tax. Requiring combined reporting of the income of multi-state corporations would help ensure the long-term […]

report  

State Corporate Income Taxes 2001-2003

February 15, 2005 • By ITEP Staff

Last September, Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy published Corporate Income Taxes in the Bush Years, an in-depth look at the taxes that 275 large, profitable corporations paid, or failed to pay, on their U.S. profits over the 2001-03 period. That study found that by 2003, these corporations were […]

brief  

State Corporate Tax Disclosure: Why It’s Needed

May 1, 2004 • By ITEP Staff

Corporate income taxes are in decline. Corporate tax revenues represent a smaller piece of the federal and state tax pie than at almost any time since World War II. While it is possible to diagnose some of the reasons for this decline on the federal level, very little public information is available to help policymakers evaluate the health of the corporate taxes collected by state governments. For this reason, some policymakers have called for better public disclosure of how much the biggest corporations are paying in state taxes. This policy brief evaluates arguments in favor of (and against) requiring detailed…

ITEP’s state corporate tax work examines the tax-paying habits of Fortune 500 corporations and corporate contributions to state revenue. It occasionally releases a comprehensive state corporate tax study as a companion to its national report on federal taxes paid (or not paid) by profitable corporations. ITEP also examines state tax incentives provided to corporations in exchange for the promise of economic growth.