Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy

Texas

ITEP Work in Action  

Every Texan: Texas Taxes Are Upside-Down. Big Tax Cuts Don’t Help.

March 18, 2025 • By ITEP Staff

Texas’ tax system is upside-down. When it comes to funding our public services, schools, and state and local governments, Texans with lower incomes are expected to pay more than their fair share. Read more.

ITEP Work in Action  

Every Texan: Current Border Militarization Operations Are a Wasteful Attempt at Deterrence

January 31, 2025 • By ITEP Staff

There is little return to show on past border militarization investments. Beginning in 2021, the Governor launched a multi-year campaign called Operation Lone Star that, in part, allowed his Trusteed Programs office to distribute billions of dollars in grants to once resource-starved border communities. SB 1 prepares to double down on this failed investment with […]

blog  

2023’s State and Local Tax Ballot Measures: Voters to Weigh in on Property Taxes, Wealth Taxes, and More

October 24, 2023 • By Jon Whiten

Even in this slow year for candidate elections, the decisions that voters in states and cities make could strengthen or weaken revenue for needs in their communities and could change how taxes are distributed across the income spectrum. In the places where tax fairness is on the ballot, much is at stake.

ITEP Work in Action  

Every Texan: Proposition 3 Will Maintain Texas’ Extreme Wealth Inequality

October 21, 2023 • By ITEP Staff

We all benefit when everyday Texans, regardless of where we live or what we look like, have a fair opportunity to prosper. Contrarily, a state tax system designed to favor the ultra-wealthy undermines all of us. In Texas, the wealth gap is so extreme that 66 billionaires living in the state own more wealth than 70% […]

ITEP Work in Action  

Washington Examiner: Think tank: Texas Isn’t a Low-tax State if You’re Poor

October 23, 2018 • By Carl Davis

Carl Davis for the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy: [ M]any states traditionally considered to be “low-tax states” are actually high-tax for their poorest residents. The “low tax” label is typically assigned to states that either lack a personal income tax or that collect a comparatively low amount of tax revenue overall. But a focus on these measures can cause lawmakers to overlook the fact that state tax systems impact different taxpayers in very different ways, and that low-income taxpayers in particular often do not experience these states as being even remotely “low tax.”

ITEP Work in Action  

CPPP: The Staggering Unfairness of Our State Tax System

October 19, 2018 • By ITEP Staff

Here’s one way to think about it: Families at the top of the income ladder receive 20 percent of all personal income in Texas, but pay only 8.5 percent of all state and local taxes. Families at the bottom of the scale receive only three percent of all income, but pay 5.7 percent of all taxes.

blog  

Low-Tax States Are Often High-Tax for the Poor

October 17, 2018 • By Carl Davis

ITEP analysis reveals that many states traditionally considered to be “low-tax states” are actually high-tax for their poorest residents. The “low tax” label is typically assigned to states that either lack a personal income tax or that collect a comparatively low amount of tax revenue overall. But a focus on these measures can cause lawmakers to overlook the fact that state tax systems impact different taxpayers in very different ways, and that low-income taxpayers often do not experience these states as being even remotely “low tax.”

ITEP Work in Action  

Center for Public Policy Priorities: The National Dream Act: What’s at stake for Texas?

December 18, 2017 • By ITEP Staff

Researchers estimate that approximately 177,000 young Texas immigrants are potentially eligible for DACA, and they currently contribute a total of $241 million to local and state taxes annually through sales and excise taxes, property taxes and income tax. Without the national Dream Act, Texas can expect to lose at least $79 million in state and […]

blog  

House Tax Plan Offers an Exceptionally Bad Deal for California, New York, New Jersey, and Maryland

November 14, 2017 • By Carl Davis

An ITEP analysis reveals that four states would see their residents pay more in aggregate federal personal income taxes under the House’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. While some individual taxpayers in every state would face a tax increase, only California, New York, Maryland, and New Jersey would see such large increases that their residents’ overall personal income tax payments rise when compared to current law.