Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP)
1,134 posts
brief  

The Folly of State Capital Gains Tax Cuts

• By Meg Wiehe

For over twenty years now, the federal tax system has treated income from capital gains more favorably than income from work. A significant number of state tax systems do as well, offering tax breaks for profits realized from local investments and, in some instances, from investments around the world. As states struggle to cope with short- and long-term budget deficits and to devise strategies to promote economic development in a sustainable fashion, policymakers should assess…

brief  

Split Roll Property Taxes

• By Carl Davis

In the past half century, state lawmakers have explored a wide variety of approaches to scaling back property taxes. One such approach is the split roll property tax, also known as a classified property tax. Unlike a regular property tax system which taxes all types of real property at the same rate, a split roll property tax applies different tax rates to different types of property. This policy brief looks at the advantages and disadvantages…

brief  

Reducing the Cost of Child Care Through Income Tax Credits

• By Meg Wiehe

Low- and middle-income working parents frequently spend a significant portion of their income on child care. As an increasing number of single parents take jobs, and as the number of two-earner families continues to rise, child care expenses are an unavoidable and increasingly unaffordable expense for these families. This policy brief looks at one way of making child care more affordable: the dependent care tax credit offered by the federal government and many states.

brief  

Property Tax Homestead Exemptions

• By Carl Davis

State lawmakers seeking to enact residential property tax relief have two broad options: across-the-board tax cuts for taxpayers at all income levels, and targeted tax breaks. More than 40 states have chosen to achieve across-the-board tax relief by providing a "homestead exemption." This policy brief explains the workings of the homestead exemption and evaluates its strengths and weaknesses as a property tax relief strategy.

brief  

Capping Property Taxes: A Primer

• By ITEP Staff

In response to what anti-tax advocates have branded as "out of control" property taxes, a number of states have decided to make use of tax "caps" to restrict the growth of local property taxes. California's Proposition 13 tax cap, approved in 1978, inspired numerous other states to enact similarly ill-conceived property tax caps. These caps can come in many forms, but all are poorly-targeted and costly. In most cases, these caps amount to a state-mandated…

brief  

Taxes and Economic Development 101

• By ITEP Staff

One of the main economic goals of most state policymakers is, quite sensibly, to attract businesses to their state. But, all too often, these policymakers have been encouraged to think that tax cuts make the best bait. A growing body of literature reminds us that taxes themselves create public infrastructure that spurs investment and improves the quality of life for businesses and workers alike. Communities that illustrate a strong commitment to public institutions like good…

brief  

Fighting Back: Accountable Economic Development Strategies

• By ITEP Staff

Even though there is little evidence that cutting taxes and reducing public investments actually spurs economic development, lawmakers across the country have been persuaded to give tax breaks to companies in hopes of encouraging a thriving economic climate in their state. Some lawmakers are wising up to the idea that subsidies don't work. But for policymakers who insist on offering incentives, there are some important, simple, and concrete steps that can be taken to ensure…

brief  

Examining Economic Development Research

• By ITEP Staff

State and local lawmakers face enormous pressure to attract and retain business investment--and all too often, anti-tax advocates will argue that tax cuts are the best approach to economic development, usually armed with "research" studies that conclude slashing taxes is necessary for economic development. But all too often, these studies are based on shoddy assumptions that make their results unreliable. This policy brief offers guidance on how to critically examine studies that claim that taxes…

report  

Texas is a Low Tax State, But Not for Families Living in Poverty

• By Meg Wiehe

Data from the Census Bureau shows that overall, Texas could be considered a “low tax state.” However, families living near or below the poverty line generally do not experience Texas as a low tax state — instead, they pay more than their fair share of state and local taxes. Read the Full Report (PDF)

report  

Washington is a Low Tax State, But Not for Families Living in Poverty

• By Meg Wiehe

Data from the Census Bureau shows that overall, Washington could be considered a “low tax state.” However, families living near or below the poverty line generally do not experience Washington as a low tax state — instead, they pay more than their fair share of state and local taxes. Read the Full Report (PDF)

report  

Tennessee is a Low Tax State, But Not for Families Living in Poverty

• By Meg Wiehe

Data from the Census Bureau shows that overall, Tennessee could be considered a “low tax state.” However, families living near or below the poverty line generally do not experience Tennessee as a low tax state — instead, they pay more than their fair share of state and local taxes. Read the Full Report (PDF)

report  

Florida is a Low Tax State, But Not for Families Living in Poverty

• By Meg Wiehe

Data from the Census Bureau shows that overall, Florida could be considered a “low tax state.” However, families living near or below the poverty line generally do not experience Florida as a low tax state — instead, they pay more than their fair share of state and local taxes. Read the Full Report (PDF)

report  

Arizona is a Low Tax State, But Not for Families Living in Poverty

• By Meg Wiehe

Data from the Census Bureau shows that overall, Arizona could be considered a “low tax state.” However, families living near or below the poverty line generally do not experience Arizona as a low tax state — instead, they pay more than their fair share of state and local taxes. Read the Full Report (PDF)

brief  

Why States That Offer the Deduction for Federal Income Taxes Paid Get it Wrong

• By ITEP Staff

As states continue to grapple with the impact of the most recent economic downturn, the budget revenue outlook for many states remains bleak. In this context, states must find ways to generate additional revenue without increasing the tax load on individuals and families struggling to make ends meet. For six states--Alabama, Iowa, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, and Oregon--one straightforward approach would be to repeal the deduction for federal income taxes paid. Repealing the deduction would help…

brief  

How State Personal Income Taxes Work

• By ITEP Staff

The personal income tax can be--and usually is--the fairest of the main revenue sources relied on by state and local governments. When properly structured, it ensures that wealthier taxpayers pay their fair share and provides lower tax rates on middle-income families. The personal income tax can be used to offset regressive sales, excise and property taxes. This policy brief explains the basic workings of the income tax.

brief  

Indexing Income Taxes for Inflation: Why It Matters

• By ITEP Staff

Most of us don't need to be reminded about inflation. We experience it every day, as the price of the goods and services we buy gradually goes up over time. As the cost of living goes up, our incomes generally go up too, partially because of inflation. But many state tax systems are not designed to take account of inflation. The result is that income taxes often grow faster than incomes--even though lawmakers haven't actually…

brief  

How State Tax Changes Affect Your Federal Taxes: A Primer on the “Federal Offset”

• By ITEP Staff

State lawmakers frequently make claims about how proposed tax changes would affect taxpayers at different income levels. Yet these lawmakers routinely ignore one important consequence of their tax reform proposals: the effect of state tax changes on their constituents' federal income taxes. Wealthier taxpayers can use the federal income tax to partially offset their state and local income and property taxes. This "federal offset" has important implications for how state tax changes affect people. This…

brief  

How Property Taxes Work

• By ITEP Staff

The property tax is the oldest major revenue source for state and local governments. At the beginning of the twentieth century, property taxes represented more than eighty percent of state and local tax revenue. While this share has diminished over time as states have introduced sales and income taxes, the property tax remains an important mechanism for funding education and other local services. This policy brief discusses why property is taxed and how property taxes…

brief  

Income Tax Simplification: How to Achieve It

• By ITEP Staff

Simplicity is generally seen as a virtue in state tax systems. Simplicity makes it easier for taxpayers to understand (and to pay) their taxes, and makes it easier for tax administrators to collect taxes fairly. In recent years, state lawmakers have proposed a wide variety of income tax changes under the guise of simplification. Yet not all of these purported tax simplification measures are well-designed to achieve it--and some measures would unnecessarily reduce the fairness…

brief  

Tax Policy Nuts and Bolts: Understanding the Tax Base and Tax Rate

• By ITEP Staff

This policy brief explains two basic, but important tax policy terms- the tax base and tax rate. Since these concepts are often confusing, having a grasp on the ins and outs of tax bases and rates will help provide a better understanding of how all state and local taxes work.

brief  

Introduction to ITEP’s Tax Incidence Analysis

• By ITEP Staff

Everyone agrees that tax "fairness" is important--even though there is often disagreement on what fairness means. A well-informed debate on who should pay the most taxes must start by assessing who actually does pay the most--and the least. Too often taxes are studied only with an eye towards tax rates instead of an understanding of how taxes impact people depending on their income. Tax incidence analyses answer basic questions by measuring how taxpayers at different…

brief  

How State Corporate Income Taxes Work

• By ITEP Staff

A robust corporate income ensures that profitable corporations that benefit from public services pay their fair share towards the maintenance of those services, just as working people do.. More than forty states currently levy a corporate income tax. This policy brief explains why corporations should be taxed and the basic workings of the corporate tax.

brief  

The “QPAI” Corporate Tax Break: How it Works and How States Can Respond

• By ITEP Staff

The past quarter century has seen a dramatic decline in the yield of corporate income taxes at both the federal and state levels. Major federal corporate tax legislation enacted in 2004 created a new tax break, known as the "Qualified Production Activities Income" (QPAI) deduction that has further accelerated the decline of the corporate tax. This policy brief evaluates the QPAI deduction and discusses possible state policy responses.

brief  

“Nowhere Income” and the Throwback Rule

• By ITEP Staff

Every state that levies a corporate income tax must determine, for each company doing business within its borders, how much of the company's profits it can tax. One factor that all such states use to make this determination is the percentage of the company's nationwide sales that can be attributed to the state. Ideally, all of a company's sales would be attributed to the states in which it operates, but, due to differences among states'…

brief  

Combined Reporting of State Corporate Income Taxes: A Primer

• By ITEP Staff

Over the past several decades, state corporate income taxes have declined markedly. One of the factors contributing to this decline has been aggressive tax avoidance on the part of large, multi-state corporations costing states billions of dollars. The most effective approach to combating corporate tax avoidance is the use of combined reporting, a method of taxation currently employed in more than half of the states with a corporate income tax. Eight states have enacted legislation…