Recent Work
2059 items
In 1996, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy released a report entitled Who Pays? A Distributional Analysis of the Tax Systems in All 50 States.1 One of the findings of the study was that in 1995, Alabama had a regressive tax structure— that middle- and low-income Alabamians paid a higher share of income in […]
The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy today released an analysis showing that states with high income tax burdens have experienced more rapid economic growth than states with low income tax burdens during the past two decades. The ITEP report, released in response to a recent Cato Institute analysis of the impact of a Tennessee […]
Tennessee’s state legislature is currently considering several proposals for increasing state tax revenues to cover newly emerging budget deficits. The following analysis compares the distributional effects of two proposals that would create broadbased income taxes in Tennessee. Read the Full Report (PDF)
A recent report by the National Taxpayers Union (NTU) tries to make the case that adoption of an income tax in Tennessee would stunt the growth of the state’s economy and cause a sharp rise in state government outlays. NTU’s arguments, however, are unpersuasive. Read the Full Report (PDF)
A recent report by the National Taxpayers Union (NTU) tries to make the case that adoption of an income tax in New Hampshire would stunt the growth of the state’s economy and cause a sharp rise in state government outlays. NTU’s arguments, however, are unpersuasive. Read the Full Report (PDF)
ITEP Testimony on Proposed Rhode Island Tax Changes Before the Rhode Island Senate Select Committee
October 7, 1999 • By ITEP Staff
The proposal being considered, to create an alternative flat-rate income tax of 5.75 percent of Federal Adjusted Gross Income, with an exclusion for capital gains income for assets held more than five years, would be a significant tax cut targeted exclusively to the wealthiest people in Rhode Island. Ninety-eight percent of the benefits of this […]
First, is Kentucky a low or high tax state? The best measure of overall tax level, in my view, is taxes as a share of personal income. By that measure Kentucky is close to the national average. Because there are many other states also close to the national average, Kentucky’s rank among the states goes […]
An Analysis of SB 535’s Proposed Corporate and Personal Capital Gains Tax Cut
June 15, 1999 • By ITEP Staff
In recent years, the tax treatment of capital gains income has been one of the most hotly contested issues in federal tax policy. This debate has recently spilled over onto the state level in Oregon with the consideration of SB 535. Oregon’s personal income tax currently subjects capital gains to the same graduated rate structure […]
The Consequences of Increasing Oregon’s Deduction for Federal Income Taxes Paid
May 15, 1999 • By ITEP Staff
Oregonians will soon be considering whether to allow taxpayers to deduct more of their federal income taxes from the Oregon personal income tax. Under current law, Oregon taxpayers can deduct up to $3,000 of federal personal income tax on their Oregon tax returns. One proposed change pending before the Legislative Assembly would increase this limit […]
Since the beginning of 1995, a series of tax changes have been enacted that are reducing New York State tax collections by several billions of dollars per year. One question which has not been adequately examined in this tax-cutting period has been the extent to which these tax cuts have, or have not, improved the […]
Economic Development in Minnesota – High Subsidies, Low Wages, Absent Standards
February 15, 1999 • By ITEP Staff
An analysis of more than 550 Minnesota economic development disclosure reports— tracking more than $176 million in loans, grants, and tax increment financing (TIF) by cities, regional bodies and state agencies—reveals high costs, low wages, and an absence of standards to ensure that job subsidies produce an effective return on taxpayers’ investment. Lacking standards, the […]
Thank you Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee for the opportunity to appear today. I will be discussing three aspects of House Bill 109, the Hager/Below/Fernald Education Funding and Property Tax Relief Plan. I will be addressing the income tax revenue estimate, the distributional impact and the economic impact of this legislation. Read the […]
An Analysis of the Effects of an Increase in Maryland’s Retirement Income Exemption
October 30, 1998 • By ITEP Staff
Several proposals for reforming the Maryland personal income tax have recently been suggested, including accelerating previously enacted rate cuts, increasing retirement income exemptions, and introducing new rate cuts above those enacted in 1997. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy has analyzed the consequences of one such plan: an increase in the retirement income exemption […]
This report offers an examination of these and other issues pertaining to the tax system of Iowa and the state’s economic and social environment. Included in the study is an assessment of the merits and shortfalls of a number of tax reform options. We hope this report will prove to be useful to both the […]
ITEP Testimony on Minnesota Tax Expenditures Before the Minnesota Corporate Subsidy Reform Commission
May 11, 1998 • By ITEP Staff
Minnesota is to be commended for having a detailed tax expenditure budget-most states do not. The report, prepared by the Department of Revenue, is a useful resource for the development of state tax and spending policy. Read the Full Report (PDF)
Institute on Taxation
and Economic Policy
ITEP is a non-profit, non-partisan tax policy organization. We conduct rigorous analyses of tax and economic proposals and provide data-driven recommendations to shape equitable and sustainable tax systems.
Subscribe to ITEP Emails
Tax research and policy news in your inbox.
Promote Fair Tax Policy
Your gift to ITEP promotes tax justice. With your help, we do research that supports taxing millionaires and billionaires, taxing big corporations and raising revenue for the things our people, our communities and our planet need.
Together, we can create a country with more economic justice, more racial justice, more climate justice… and more tax justice.