Recent Work

Texas: Who Pays? 6th Edition

October 17, 2018 • By ITEP Staff

TEXAS Read as PDF TEXAS STATE AND LOCAL TAXES Taxes as Share of Family Income Top 20% Income Group Lowest 20% Second 20% Middle 20% Fourth 20% Next 15% Next 4% Top 1% Income Range Less than $20,900 $20,900 to $35,800 $35,800 to $56,000 $56,000 to $98,200 $98,200 to $216,000 $216,000 to $617,900 over $617,900 […]

Louisiana: Who Pays? 6th Edition

October 17, 2018 • By ITEP Staff

LOUISIANA Read as PDF LOUISIANA STATE AND LOCAL TAXES Taxes as Share of Family Income Top 20% Income Group Lowest 20% Second 20% Middle 20% Fourth 20% Next 15% Next 4% Top 1% Income Range Less than $17,100 $17,100 to $32,500 $32,500 to $50,300 $50,300 to $91,500 $91,500 to $187,200 $187,200 to $473,000 over $473,000 […]

Connecticut: Who Pays? 6th Edition

October 17, 2018 • By ITEP Staff

CONNECTICUT Read as PDF CONNECTICUT STATE AND LOCAL TAXES Taxes as Share of Family Income Top 20% Income Group Lowest 20% Second 20% Middle 20% Fourth 20% Next 15% Next 4% Top 1% Income Range Less than $23,300 $23,300 to $45,800 $45,800 to $77,100 $77,100 to $131,500 $131,500 to $341,400 $341,400 to $968,200 over $968,200 […]

Indiana: Who Pays? 6th Edition

October 17, 2018 • By ITEP Staff

INDIANA Read as PDF INDIANA STATE AND LOCAL TAXES Taxes as Share of Family Income Top 20% Income Group Lowest 20% Second 20% Middle 20% Fourth 20% Next 15% Next 4% Top 1% Income Range Less than $18,800 $18,800 to $36,100 $36,100 to $58,000 $58,000 to $92,300 $92,300 to $183,500 $183,500 to $436,100 over $436,100 […]

Washington: Who Pays? 6th Edition

October 17, 2018 • By ITEP Staff

WASHINGTON Read as PDF WASHINGTON STATE AND LOCAL TAXES Taxes as Share of Family Income Top 20% Income Group Lowest 20% Second 20% Middle 20% Fourth 20% Next 15% Next 4% Top 1% Income Range Less than $24,000 $24,000 to $44,000 $44,000 to $70,100 $70,100 to $116,300 $116,300 to $248,200 $248,200 to $545,900 over $545,900 […]

Idaho: Who Pays? 6th Edition

October 17, 2018 • By ITEP Staff

According to ITEP’s Tax Inequality Index, which measures the impact of each state’s tax system on income inequality, Idaho has the 38th most unfair state and local tax system in the country. Incomes are more unequal in Idaho after state and local taxes are collected than before.

Kansas: Who Pays? 6th Edition

October 17, 2018 • By ITEP Staff

KANSAS Read as PDF KANSAS STATE AND LOCAL TAXES Taxes as Share of Family Income Top 20% Income Group Lowest 20% Second 20% Middle 20% Fourth 20% Next 15% Next 4% Top 1% Income Range Less than $21,500 $21,500 to $39,800 $39,800 to $62,700 $62,700 to $102,600 $102,600 to $206,900 $206,900 to $479,200 over $479,200 […]

South Dakota: Who Pays? 6th Edition

October 17, 2018 • By ITEP Staff

SOUTH DAKOTA Read as PDF SOUTH DAKOTA STATE AND LOCAL TAXES Taxes as Share of Family Income Top 20% Income Group Lowest 20% Second 20% Middle 20% Fourth 20% Next 15% Next 4% Top 1% Income Range Less than $25,800 $25,800 to $40,400 $40,400 to $67,100 $67,100 to $109,900 $109,900 to $230,000 $230,000 to $559,000 […]

State Rundown 10/12: Local Jurisdictions Fighting for Revenues, Independence

October 12, 2018 • By ITEP Staff

Voters all around the country are educating themselves for the upcoming elections, notably this week around ballot initiatives in Arizona and Colorado and competing gubernatorial tax proposals in Georgia and Illinois. But not all eyes are on the elections, as the relationship between state and local policy made news in Delaware, Idaho, North Dakota, and Ohio.

ITEP Comments and Recommendations on Proposed Section 170 Regulation (REG-112176-18)

October 11, 2018 • By Carl Davis

The IRS recently proposed a commonsense improvement to the federal charitable deduction. If finalized, the regulation would prevent not just the newest workarounds to the $10,000 deduction for state and local taxes (SALT), but also a longer-running tax shelter abused by wealthy donors to private K-12 school voucher programs. ITEP has submitted official comments outlining four key recommendations related to the proposed regulation.

Race, Wealth and Taxes: How the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Supercharges the Racial Wealth Divide

October 11, 2018 • By Meg Wiehe

A newly released report by Prosperity Now and the Institution on Taxation and Economic Policy, Race, Wealth and Taxes: How the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Supercharges the Racial Wealth Divide, finds that the TCJA not only adds unnecessary fuel to the growing problem of overall economic inequality, but also supercharges an already massive racial wealth divide to an alarming extent.

‘Financial Exposure’ Showcases Tax Misconduct by Powerful Individuals and Corporations

October 10, 2018 • By Peter Della-Rocca

Elise J. Bean’s Financial Exposure reiterates the point that tax avoidance and tax evasion were endemic to our financial system long before allegations against a sitting president brought them to the forefront of the public consciousness.

State Rundown 10/4: Ballot/Election Season in Full Swing

October 4, 2018 • By ITEP Staff

South Carolina lawmakers have finally passed a federal conformity bill in response to last year’s federal tax-cut legislation. Voters in many states are hearing a lot about tax-related questions they’ll see on the ballot in November, particularly residents of Florida, Montana, and Oregon, where corporate donors and other anti-tax interests are spending major sums to alter policy in their states. And states continue to work on ensuring they can collect online sales taxes and, in some states, online sports betting taxes.

Twelve States Offer Profitable Tax Shelter to Private School Voucher Donors; IRS Proposal Could Fix This

October 2, 2018 • By Carl Davis

A proposed IRS regulation would eliminate a tax shelter for private school donors in twelve states by making a commonsense improvement to the federal tax deduction for charitable gifts. For years, some affluent taxpayers who donate to private K-12 school voucher programs have managed to turn a profit by claiming state tax credits and federal tax deductions that, taken together, are worth more than the amount donated. This practice could soon come to an end under the IRS’s broader goal of ending misuse of the charitable deduction by people seeking to dodge the federal SALT deduction cap.

So-Called “Universal Savings Accounts” in Tax Cuts 2.0 Are a Giveaway to the Most Affluent Taxpayers

September 27, 2018 • By Steve Wamhoff

This week, House Republicans have taken up bills they call tax cuts “2.0.” Most of the attention, so far, has focused on the bill that extends—at great cost—the temporary parts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). But other legislation in the package contains provisions that make the whole deal even more tilted toward the richest households, including one that would create “Universal Savings Accounts.” Far from being universal, these new savings vehicles would benefit the same high-income households that enjoy the bulk of the tax cuts from TCJA.