Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy

Analysis of Tax Provisions in the Trump Megabill as Signed into Law: National and State Level Estimates

By Carl Davis (Research Director), Jessica Vela (Federal Analyst), Joe Hughes (Senior Analyst), Steve Wamhoff (Federal Policy Director)

Share

On July 4, President Trump signed into law the tax and spending “megabill” which makes permanent the provisions of the 2017 tax law that were set to expire and makes many additional changes beyond that. This analysis examines the tax provisions in the law and provides numbers generated with the ITEP microsimulation model.

Overall, the law favors the richest taxpayers and provides working-class Americans with relatively small tax cuts that will in many cases be more than offset by the import taxes, or tariffs, imposed by President Trump.

The new law will have the following effects on taxpayers:

  • More than 70 percent of the net tax cuts will go to the richest fifth of Americans in 2026, only 10 percent will go to the middle fifth of Americans, and less than 1 percent will go to the poorest fifth.
  • The richest 5 percent alone will receive 45 percent of the net tax cuts next year.
  • The richest 1 percent of Americans will receive an average net tax cut of $66,000, many, many times more than the average tax cut received by other income groups.
  • The richest 1 percent of Americans will receive a total of $117 billion in net tax cuts in 2026. The middle 20 percent of taxpayers on the income scale, a group that has 20 times the number of taxpayers as the richest 1 percent, will receive less than half that much, $53 billion in net tax cuts that year.
  • The $117 billion in net tax cuts going to the richest 1 percent next year will exceed the amount going to the entire bottom 60 percent of taxpayers (about $77 billion).
  • The effects of President Trump’s tariff policies alone offset most of the tax cuts for the bottom 80 percent of Americans. For the bottom 40 percent of Americans, the tariffs impose a cost that is greater than the tax cuts they will receive under this legislation.
  • Even foreign investors who own shares in U.S. companies will benefit more than many Americans. These foreign investors will enjoy $32 billion in tax cuts in 2026 compared to just $1.5 billion for the bottom 20 percent of Americans.
  • The law provides the greatest rewards to high-income people living in states that have low state and local taxes on the wealthy. In these states, high-income people are not much affected by the cap on deductions for state and local taxes, which the law extends. As illustrated in Figure 6, the states where the richest 1 percent of residents receive the largest average net tax cuts will mostly be states that have particularly unfair tax systems because they have no personal income tax.

These figures do not include other potential costs to families in the megabill, such as deep cuts to Medicaid and food assistance. These cuts will have adverse health and financial implications for families that directly benefit from these programs. The cuts will also harm others in communities that are broadly dependent on these funding streams—such as rural communities, which will see hospital closings.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 6

The megabill has three categories of tax provisions providing the biggest tax cuts to the richest 1 percent:

  • Changes in tax rates and brackets will cut taxes for the richest 1 percent by an average $30,000 in 2026.
  • The extension of the pass-through deduction (section 199A) for business owners will reduce taxes for the top 1 percent by an average $27,000 next year.
  • A collection of business tax changes affecting corporations and other businesses will cut taxes by an average $38,000 next year for the top 1 percent.
  • The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) and estate tax provisions provide more for the rich on top of that.

Provisions changing itemized deductions (most importantly the cap on itemized deductions for state and local taxes, or SALT) claw back an average of $38,000 of the tax cuts for the richest 1 percent. The SALT cap serves as a very partial limit on tax cuts for the richest Americans.

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 8

Revenue Impact of Tax Provisions Included in this Analysis of the Trump Megabill in 2026

Provisions Revenue Impact
Extending and Modifying TCJA Provisions Expiring End of 2025 and Related Changes
Rates and Brackets —$204 billion
Standard Deduction —$117 billion
Personal Exemptions +$147 billion
Child Tax Credit —$89 billion
Pass-Through Deduction —$79 billion
Alternative Minimum Tax —$142 billion
Itemized Deductions +$103 billion
Estate Tax —$20 billion
Total TCJA Provisions Expiring End of 2025 —$402 billion
New Provisions Proposed as Middle-Class Tax Cuts
Deduction for Tips —$10 billion
Deduction for Overtime Pay —$23 billion
Enhanced Deduction for Seniors —$20 billion
Exclusion for Car Loan Interest —$6 billion
Total New Provisions Proposed as Middle-Class Tax Cuts —$58 billion
Business Tax Breaks (excluding pass-through deduction in TCJA)
Reinstate bonus depreciation —$65 billion
Reinstate research expensing —$20 billion
Reinstate more generous limits on deductions for interest —$6 billion
New international corporate rules —$19 billion
Special depreciation allowance for qualified production property —$34 billion
Section 179 small business expensing expanded —$4 billion
Extension and modification of clean fuel production credit —$2 billion
Extend and modify opportunity zones —$8 billion
Expand advanced manufacturing investment credit —$3 billion
Capital gains from farmland —$3 billion
Total Business Tax Breaks —$165 billion
Other Tax Provisions
Repeal and phase out green tax provisions +$37 billion
Limits on ACA credits +$14 billion
Strengthen limit on deductions for high compensation +$1 billion
1 percent floor on corporate charitable deductions +$2 billion
Treatment of payments from partnerships to partners for property or services +$2 billion
Total Other Tax Provisions +$56 billion
TOTAL —$568 billion
ITEP.org
ITEP

 


State-by-State Data

Download national and state-by-state estimates

Alabama Illinois Montana Rhode Island
Alaska Indiana Nebraska South Carolina
Arizona Iowa Nevada South Dakota
Arkansas Kansas New Hampshire Tennessee
California Kentucky New Jersey Texas
Colorado Louisiana New Mexico Utah
Connecticut Maine New York Vermont
Delaware Maryland North Carolina Virginia
District of Columbia Massachusetts North Dakota Washington
Florida Michigan Ohio West Virginia
Georgia Minnesota Oklahoma Wisconsin
Hawaii Mississippi Oregon Wyoming
Idaho Missouri Pennsylvania U.S.