Skip to content

ITEP Logo
  • About
    • Mission & History
    • Staff
    • Tax Microsimulation Model
    • Board of Directors
    • Employment
    • Contact

  • Federal Policy
  • State Policy
  • Local Policy
  • Publications
    • Reports & Policy Briefs
    • Blog
  • Racial Equity
  • Maps
  • Newsroom
  • Blog
  • Donate

ITEP's Research Priorities

  • Blog
  • Cannabis Taxes
  • Corporate Taxes
  • Corporate Taxes
  • Earned Income Tax Credit
  • Education Tax Breaks
  • Estate Tax
  • Federal Policy
  • Fines and Fees
  • Immigration
  • Income Taxes
  • Inequality and the Economy
  • ITEP Work in Action
  • Local Income Taxes
  • Local Policy
  • Local Property Taxes
  • Local Refundable Tax Credits
  • Local Sales Taxes
  • Maps
  • News Releases
  • Personal Income Taxes
  • Property Taxes
  • Property Taxes
  • Publications
  • Refundable Tax Credits
  • Sales, Gas and Excise Taxes
  • Sales, Gas and Excise Taxes
  • SALT Deduction
  • Select Media Mentions
  • Social Media
  • Staff
  • Staff Quotes
  • State Corporate Taxes
  • State Policy
  • State Reports
  • States
  • Tax Analyses
  • Tax Basics
  • Tax Credits for Workers and Families
  • Tax Credits for Workers and Families
  • Tax Reform Options and Challenges
  • Taxing Wealth and Income from Wealth
  • Trump Tax Policies
  • Who Pays?
  • ITEP Work in Action   November 2, 2018

    Oregon Center for Public Policy: It’s Time to Fix Oregon’s Regressive Tax Structure

    Oregon’s poorest families pay more in taxes as a share of income than any group of taxpayers in the state, while the richest Oregonians pay the smallest share of any group. That is the conclusion of a new report by the Washington, D.C.-based Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP).

  • ITEP Work in Action   November 1, 2018

    Cherokee Tribune & Ledger-News: Financial Watchdog: Pritzker’s Spending Promises Would Raise Taxes on Middle Class

    The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy says Illinois has one of the most regressive taxes in the nation, largely due to its flat income tax. In its annual “Who pays?” report, the institute said the poorest 20 percent of Illinois households pay 14 percent of their income in taxes because of the flat tax in addition to high sales and property taxes.

  • media mention   October 30, 2018

    Inside Higher Ed: Democratic Contenders Get Ambitious With Equity Proposals

    The Harris tax credit bill, called the LIFT the Middle Class Act, could also have implications for higher ed access — although the legislation wouldn’t have the same focus on assisting students from the poorest families. The proposal would function like a beefed-up version of the earned income tax credit and phase in quickly for individuals and married couples who work.

    It would offer substantial immediate benefits. Families earning up to $60,000 could receive up to $6,000 annually under the proposal. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy estimated that one million Pell-eligible students would qualify for a $3,000 tax credit under the plan.

  • ITEP Work in Action   October 30, 2018

    Common Dreams: Time for a Tax on Billionaire Wealth Dynasties

    The public should also rally to levy a modest tax on wealth over $20 million. A direct tax on wealth paid by the wealthiest one tenth of one percent could generate significant revenue to be reinvested in creating and restoring opportunities for low wealth households to prosper. A 1 percent annual tax on the wealthiest 0.1 percent of households, those with wealth over $20 million, would generate an estimated $1.899 trillion in revenue over the next decade, according to a forthcoming report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

  • ITEP Work in Action   October 29, 2018

    Voices for Illinois Children: Who Pays In Illinois? Mostly The Poor And Middle Class

    A new report from the Institute of Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) shows the poorest 20 percent of Illinois households pay nearly twice as much in state and local taxes as the richest one percent. As a result, ITEP ranks Illinois as the eighth most regressive tax system in the country.

  • media mention   October 29, 2018

    NJ Spotlight: GOP Leaders Call on NJ Democrats to Reconsider Middle-class Tax Cuts

    The related tax-cut bills — and another that would shield most retirement-savings contributions from state income taxes — were introduced at the start of the year but have not been posted for votes by the Democratic leaders who control the Assembly’s agenda. Bucco suggested a report released earlier this month by the left-leaning Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy that found middle-income taxpayers in New Jersey pay a higher effective tax rate than any other group — including the top 1 percent of earners — as a reason to begin prioritizing adoption of the GOP bills.

  • ITEP Work in Action   October 29, 2018

    California Budget & Policy Center: Last Year’s Federal Tax Law Exacerbates the Racial Wealth Gap

    Much has been written about how the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), pushed by Republican leaders in Congress and signed into law by President Trump in December 2017, mostly benefits wealthy households while driving up the federal deficit by $1.9 trillion over the next 10 years. This growing deficit — already 17% higher in the federal fiscal year that ended on September 30 than in the previous year — threatens federal funding for critical investments and services that provide economic security and opportunity for low- and middle-income households.

  • media mention   October 29, 2018

    PolitiFact: Does Vermont Have the ‘Most Progressive’ Tax System in the Country?

    Carl Davis, the research director for ITEP, said he doesn’t believe it would be accurate to call Vermont the most progressive state. California has a much higher top rate for the wealthiest taxpayers, he said. 

    “In our research Vermont does not have the most progressive system in the nation, but it is certainly far less regressive than the vast majority of states,” Davis said.

  • ITEP Work in Action   October 27, 2018

    Charleston Gazette-Mail: Statehouse Beat: Fake History on Teacher Strike Hard to Fathom

    Speaking of the Senate, the nonpartisan Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy put out its annual “Who Pays” report on tax equity, which found the vast majority of states have tax systems that are inequitable, with lower- and middle-income families paying a larger percentage of income in taxes than upper-income families.It singled out the “Terrible 10” states with the most regressive tax systems, with the common denominator among those states being that they have no or very low income taxes, which they make up through having very high and broad-based sales taxes.

  • ITEP Work in Action   October 26, 2018

    KUOW: A $40,000 Salary Is no Longer Middle Class in Washington State. Here’s Why.

    Look what’s happened to an income of $40,000. In 2015, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), based in Washington, D.C., looked at incomes in Washington state and found that a salary of $40,000 was still middle class. It was smack-dab in the middle of middle-earning incomes in the state.

    In 2018, ITEP looked again. This time, $40,000 had slipped a notch, to the second-lowest 20 percent of earners. The reason: More people in the state were making higher-end incomes.

  • ITEP Work in Action   October 26, 2018

    The Olympian: Olympia Went to Court to Block an Income Tax Proposal. Two Years Later, It’s Backing Seattle’s Version.

    In 2016, an Olympia household earning $25,000 a year paid about 13 percent of its income in state and local taxes, while a household earning $250,000 paid less than 4 percent, according to the resolution.

    A report this month from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy said Washington has the most regressive tax structure in the country, thanks to its lack of a personal income tax and comparatively high sales taxes.

  •   October 25, 2018

    We’re sorry to see you go…

    Thank you for your response! We understand that in this age of rapid communication, too many emails can bring unwanted clutter to your inbox while too few emails can leave…
  • ITEP Work in Action   October 25, 2018

    Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center: Who Pays? Low and Middle Earners in Massachusetts Pay Larger Share of their Incomes in Taxes

    Taxes are the main way communities pay for the things we do together. Taxes pay for essential programs and infrastructure we take for granted, like fire protection, public education, and health inspectors; roads, bridges, and public transit; and the support for people facing hard times. Examining how much people at different income levels pay in taxes is important when considering the fairness of tax policy.

  • ITEP Work in Action   October 25, 2018

    Oregon Center for Public Policy: Measure 105 Would Set Oregon Back

    Immigrants, regardless of their immigration status, give the economy a boost. In Marion County alone, undocumented immigrants pay more than $14 million in taxes every year to local and state…
  • ITEP Work in Action   October 25, 2018

    News and Tribune: In Indiana and Illinois, Taxes Hit Low-earners Hard

    TERRE HAUTE — Low-earning residents of Indiana and Illinois pay a greater share of state and local taxes than those in all other Midwestern states, and those in most states nationally, according to a new study by a non-partisan think tank.

  •   October 25, 2018

    U.S.: Who Pays? 6th Edition

  • media mention   October 25, 2018

    The Columbia Missourian: New Tax on Motor Fuels Would Rev up Road and Bridge Spending

    As it stands, only Alaska has a lower fuel tax than Missouri. Every neighboring state’s tax is higher. And more than 20 states increased their fuel taxes between 2013 and…
  • ITEP Work in Action   October 25, 2018

    The Garden Island: Gap Keeps Growing Between Rich, Poor

    The study finds that those in the bottom fifth of the income spectrum in Hawaii pay 15 percent of their income in state and local taxes, while those in the top 1 percent pay only 8.9 percent, “which exacerbates inequality in our state,” according to a press release about the study.

  • media mention   October 24, 2018

    Bloomberg: Kamala Harris Tax Plan Would Cost $2.8 Trillion, Conservative Group Says

    ITEP’s Wiehe said the plan is more highly targeted than the 2017 tax law to help low-income workers. The poorest 20 percent would see a $2,100 benefit under the Harris plan, compared with $80 under the GOP plan, she said. About 123 million workers would receive tax breaks under the plan, according to Wiehe.

  • blog   October 24, 2018

    Shaking up TCJA: How a Proposed New Credit Could Shift Federal Tax Cuts from the Wealthy and Corporations to Working People

    A new federal proposal, the Livable Incomes for Families Today (LIFT) the Middle Class Act, would create a new refundable tax credit for low- and middle-income working families who were little more than an afterthought in last year’s federal tax overhaul. This proposal would take the place of TCJA, providing tax cuts similar in cost to the recent federal tax law but targeted toward working people rather than the wealthy. ITEP analyzed the bill, proposed by California Senator Kamala Harris, and compared its potential impact to TCJA.

  • ITEP Work in Action   October 24, 2018

    Real Change: Study: Washington Bottoms Out on US Tax Assessment

    Guess what? Washington state’s taxation system continues to be one of the most regressive in the country.

    This news comes from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), which did a deep dive into the taxation policies of all 50 states.

  • media mention   October 24, 2018

    The Fiscal Times: Democrats Take Aim at Republicans on Entitlement Cuts

    The ITEP analysis of federal tax cuts from 2001 to 2018 found that they had reduced revenues by trillions of dollars, with a big chunk of the benefits flowing to the wealthiest 1 percent of taxpayers. “By the end of 2025, the tally of tax cuts will grow to $10.6 trillion,” the ITEP report says. “Nearly $2 trillion of this amount will have gone to the richest 1 percent.”

  • ITEP Work in Action   October 24, 2018

    The Journal Record: Prosperity Policy: An Upside-down Tax System

    A modestly progressive income tax slightly offsets our regressive sales taxes. But Oklahoma lawmakers cut our top income tax rate by nearly 25 percent since 2004, further tipping the scales to the wealthiest households. Then while grappling with massive budget shortfalls caused in part by these tax cuts, lawmakers took aim at measures that primarily benefit low- and middle-income working families by making the state Earned Income Tax Credit non-refundable and freezing the state standard deduction, while leaving cuts to the top income tax rate in place.

  • ITEP Work in Action   October 24, 2018

    Hawaii Public Radio: Hawaii Tax System Places Larger Burden on Low Income Residents

    Low-income residents in Hawaii are paying a higher share of their income in taxes than higher level earners. That is the conclusion of a recent report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy titled Who Pays? The Hawaii tax system is considered highly regressive, due to heavy reliance on the General Excise Tax, or GET. This is despite a progressive, graded state income tax and the lowest property taxes in the nation.

  • ITEP Work in Action   October 23, 2018

    Third and State: Pennsylvania’s Terrible Tax Code Asks More of You as You Make Less: Hitting Community’s of Color Especially Hard

    The Commonwealth once again claims its spot in the “Terrible 10” most unfair tax structures in the nation. The lowest 20% of income earners in the state pays more than double (2.3 times) their share of family income on state and local taxes than the top 1%.

  • Posts navigation

    « older items
    newer items »
bar chart icon

ITEP

Washington, DC Office
1200 18th Street, NW, Suite 675
Washington, DC 20036

Phone: 202-299-1066
Fax: 202-299-1065
e-mail: [email protected]



  • Donate